Galatasaray 2025/26 Season Analysis: Statistics That Led to the Championship

Galatasaray 2025/26 Season Analysis: The Numbers Behind the Championship

Galatasaray finished the 2025/26 Trendyol Süper Lig season as champions with 24 wins, 5 draws and 5 defeats in 34 matches.

The title was not built only on results. Statistically, Galatasaray established one of the strongest profiles in the league across possession, chance creation, passing quality and attacking production.

StatsLook data shows the championship was built around five core pillars:

• possession dominance

• open-play chance generation

• passing control

• penalty-area production

• creative output

League-Leading Control of the Game

Galatasaray’s biggest advantage throughout the season was possession and passing dominance.

2025/26 Süper Lig rankings:

• 1st in possession: 62%

• 1st in passes: 508.47 per match

• 1st in successful passes: 443.79 per match

• 1st in pass accuracy: 86.82%

• 1st in touches: 690.44 per match

• 1st in short passes: 459.71 per match

Galatasaray were not only winning games; they were controlling them.

They finished as the league’s highest-volume passing side while maintaining the best accuracy levels.

The League’s Most Productive Attack

Galatasaray finished the season with 77 goals, averaging 2.26 goals per game, tied for the best attacking record in the league.

The underlying production metrics were even more impressive.

Team attacking rankings:

• 1st in xG: 1.98 per match (67.4 total)

• 1st in non-penalty xG: 1.84 per match

• 1st in open-play xG: 1.47 per match

• 1st in goal attempts: 12.15 per match

• 1st in shots inside the box: 11.47 per match

These numbers show Galatasaray created elite-quality opportunities consistently.

The open-play xG leadership is particularly important because it reflects sustainable attacking production rather than dependence on penalties or set pieces.

Setting the Creative Standard

Galatasaray also led the league in creative production.

Team rankings:

• 1st in chances created: 10.18 per match

• 1st in assists: 1.65 per match

• 1st in big chances created: 3.53 per match

• 1st in key passes: 12.65 per match

• 1st in accurate crosses: 6.53 per match

• 2nd in total crosses: 22.03 per match

The attacking structure generated threats from multiple channels:

• wide areas

• crosses

• through balls

• penalty-box movements

• individual actions

Galatasaray’s attack was diversified rather than dependent on one route.

Victor Osimhen: The Finishing Engine

Victor Osimhen became the focal point of Galatasaray’s attack.

Season numbers:

• 15 goals

• 5 assists

• 97 shots

• 40 shots on target

• 7.32 average rating

League rankings:

• 3rd in goals scored

• 1st in total shots

• 1st in shots on target

Osimhen was not only the main scorer; he was also the player carrying the largest share of final actions.

Barış Alper Yılmaz Emerged as One of the League’s Top Creators

Barış Alper added another dimension to Galatasaray’s attack.

Season production:

• 11 assists

• 59 key passes

• 45 chances created

• 13 big chances created

• 50 fouls won

• 47 successful dribbles

League rankings:

• 3rd in assists

• 2nd in woodwork hits

His role evolved beyond a traditional winger profile.

He contributed as a creator, carrier and secondary scorer.

Sara – Sané – Yunus: The Creative Triangle

Galatasaray’s attacking production was not concentrated around a single player.

Gabriel Sara

Season output:

• 56 key passes

• 48 chances created

• 49 accurate crosses

• 7.29 average rating

League rankings:

• 4th in chances created

• 3rd in accurate crosses

Leroy Sané

Season output:

• 16 big chances created

• 48 key passes

• 67 successful dribbles

• 7 goals

• 5 assists

League rankings:

• 1st in successful dribbles

• 4th in dribble attempts

• 2nd in big chances created

Sané brought verticality and individual progression.

Yunus Akgün

Season output:

• 9 assists

• 15 big chances created

• 48 key passes

League rankings:

• 4th in assists

• 3rd in big chances created

Together, this trio prevented Galatasaray from becoming overly dependent on a single attacking source.

Defensive Stability and xGA Profile

Galatasaray conceded only 30 goals and kept 12 clean sheets.

Defensive metrics:

• 2nd in xGA: 0.96 per match

• 32.5 total xGA

The team consistently limited the quality of opposition chances.

The centre-back partnership also played a major role in build-up.

League rankings:

Abdülkerim Bardakcı

• 3rd in passes

• 4th in accurate passes

Davinson Sánchez

• 5th in passes

• 5th in accurate passes

• 1st in offsides provoked

Galatasaray’s defensive line was not only defending; it initiated possession dominance.

Midfield Control and Passing Quality

The midfield structure built around Lucas Torreira, İlkay Gündoğan, Mario Lemina and Gabriel Sara was key.

İlkay Gündoğan finished:

• 1st in league pass accuracy: 93.21%

Lucas Torreira contributed:

• 50.77 passes per match

• 46.23 accurate passes

• 120 recoveries

• 53 tackles

The passing superiority was created not only by defenders but also by elite midfield circulation.

The Weak Point: Finishing Efficiency

Despite winning the league, one area remains open for improvement.

Team metrics:

• Shooting Performance: -0.02

• Big chances missed: 1.94 per match

• Total big chances missed: 66

Galatasaray generated elite attacking volume but did not always convert it efficiently.

The title came through production quality rather than maximum finishing efficiency.

Physical Efficiency Over Volume

Galatasaray were not among the highest-volume duel teams.

League rankings:

• Total duels: 17th

• Duels won: 15th

However efficiency remained strong:

• 4th in duel success rate: 51.72%

• 3rd in aerial success: 54.86%

• Lowest duels lost in the league

• Lowest aerial duels lost in the league

Galatasaray entered fewer physical battles but performed efficiently when they did.

StatsLook Verdict

Galatasaray’s 2025/26 championship was backed by one of the strongest statistical profiles in the league.

League leaders in:

• possession

• xG

• non-penalty xG

• open-play xG

• chances created

• assists

• key passes

• accurate crosses

• penalty-area shots

The title was built on sustainable team production rather than dependence on individual brilliance.

Low xGA, elite possession control and diversified attacking output created the foundation of the championship.

The remaining improvement area is clear:

higher finishing efficiency.

If Galatasaray maintain this production level while improving conversion rates, they will remain one of the strongest reference teams in Turkish football.

Explore Galatasaray’s Season on StatsLook

On StatsLook, users can explore:

• team statistics

• player performances

• league rankings

• team comparisons

• player comparisons

• scout profiles

• season trends

• advanced analytics

and analyze Galatasaray’s championship season in detail.