statslook

Cerca

Cerca tra giocatori, squadre, campionati, partite e allenatori

News
June 24, 2026 · 6 min di lettura

19 Shots Not Enough: England Suffers Unexpected Loss to Ghana in World Cup

England drew 0-0 with Ghana in a match where they had 79% possession and took 19 shots. Ghana's defense and Asare's saves secured the point.

Condividi
19 Shots Not Enough: England Suffers Unexpected Loss to Ghana in World Cup

England drew 0-0 with Ghana in the group stage of the 2026 World Cup.

The score might suggest a balanced match, but the game itself was not balanced. England had the ball, utilized the pitch, applied pressure, and took shots. The only thing missing was a goal.

Ghana, on the other hand, was not concerned with possession. They tightened the game, defended their penalty area, blocked shots, and secured a point.

England Dominated the Game, But Couldn't Score

England finished the match with 79% possession.

Failing to convert such high possession into goals is a problem in itself.

Tuchel's team made 633 passes with a 93% pass accuracy. Ghana, however, managed only 173 passes.

The pass difference is 460.

This difference indicates that England controlled the game. But control alone doesn't win matches. Especially if the quality of decision-making around the penalty area drops, possession only serves to delay the opponent.

19 Shots, 3 On Target, 0 Goals

England's main issue was not the number of shots, but their inability to convert shot quality into goals.

Throughout the match:

  • 19 shots

  • 3 shots on target

  • 1.52 xG

  • 2 clear chances

were created.

Ghana's numbers were much more limited:

  • 2 shots

  • 1 shot on target

  • 0.33 xG

  • 1 clear chance

This table does not explain the 0-0 scoreline, but it does explain why England dropped two points.

The fact that only 3 of the 19 shots were on target is a major issue. England created enough chances, but their finishing quality was lacking.

They Entered the Penalty Area But Couldn't Convert

Of England's 19 shots, 14 came from inside the penalty area.

The xG value from inside the penalty area was 1.21.

The xG value from the 5 shots taken from outside was only 0.31.

So, England was not just a team that tried from distance. They also entered the penalty area. However, these entries did not result in goals.

Harry Kane produced 0.47 xG from 3 shots. He had the highest xG value for England, but he too couldn't change the score.

Elliot Anderson was the most active player with 4 shots. Declan Rice contributed with 3 shots and 0.21 xG from midfield. Nico O'Reilly came on as a substitute and produced 2 shots and 0.23 xG.

This distribution shows that England did not rely on a single player for chances, but tried with different players. However, the final touch in the penalty area was weak.

Ghana's Defense Carried the Match

The section that allowed Ghana to earn a point was not the attack, but the defense.

As a team:

  • 39 clearances

  • 22 interceptions

  • 8 tackles

  • 7 blocked shots

  • 24 fouls

were made.

These numbers show how deep and intense Ghana's defense was throughout the match.

Especially the 7 blocked shots were critical. England took 19 shots, but Ghana's defense constantly closed off paths to the goal.

Jerome Opoku received a rating of 7.35. Gideon Mensah played with a rating of 7.31. Marvin Senaya reached a rating of 7.26. It's no coincidence that the highest ratings for Ghana came from defenders.

In this match, Ghana's attacking plan was almost nonexistent. But their defensive plan worked.

Benjamin Asare's 3 Saves Earned a Point

Ghana's goalkeeper Benjamin Asare finished the match with a rating of 7.22.

He made 3 saves and did not concede a goal.

He preserved the score on all 3 of England's shots on target. The fact that the goalkeeper did not make a mistake in such a low-shot accuracy match was crucial for Ghana.

Pickford, on the other hand, finished the 90 minutes without making a save. This clearly illustrates the direction of the match. England's goalkeeper was hardly tested, while Ghana's goalkeeper was one of the key players in preserving the point.

England's Pressure Did Not Translate to Goals

In the Pressure Index, most of the match was dominated by England.

England particularly carried the game into Ghana's half during two long stretches:

  • 2-54 minutes: 6 shots, 0.46 xG

  • 58-90+ minutes: 13 shots, 1.07 xG

A total of 19 shots came in these two periods.

No goals came from them.

That's the problem here.

England applied pressure but could not finish cleanly in the penalty area. Ghana, on the other hand, broke these waves of pressure with blocks, fouls, clearances, and goalkeeper performance.

They Regained the Ball Every 11 Seconds

England's pressing data was very strong.

They regained possession on average every 11 seconds.

Ghana's ball recovery time was 36 seconds.

This difference explains why England constantly played in the opponent's half. Even when Ghana regained the ball, they could not hold onto it for long.

But high pressing does not always produce goals. England won second balls, maintained pressure, and closed the game. However, they could not find the same quality in final actions.

Declan Rice Was One of England's Most Effective Players

Declan Rice stood out with a rating of 7.68, becoming one of England's key players.

In 90 minutes:

  • 45 passes

  • 93% pass accuracy

  • 6 key passes

  • 3 shots

  • 0.21 xG

were produced.

Rice's 6 key passes were one of the most notable individual statistics of the match.

This indicates that England found production from the center and the second area. The problem was not in starting the production, but in finishing it.

Marc Guéhi also had a rating of 7.87, making him England's highest-rated player. He attempted 129 passes, with 126 being successful. He played with 98% pass accuracy.

The defender's high volume of passes is another indication of how deep Ghana was sitting back.

For Ghana, This Was Not an Attacking Match

Ghana's attacking data remained very limited.

They only took 2 shots.

Prince Adu found the team's most valuable position with 0.22 xG. Marvin Senaya's shot produced 0.11 xG.

Aside from that, Ghana had no clear attacking continuity.

But the match plan did not seem to be built around possessing the ball. For Ghana, the priority was to prevent England from easily penetrating through the center, keep the penalty area crowded, and break the game in the second half.

This plan did not produce a score but did earn a point.

Match Summary

England's problem was not that they couldn't play the game.

The problem was failing to find a goal in such a dominant performance.

The standout numbers are clear:

  • Possession: 79% - 21%

  • Shots: 19 - 2

  • Shots on target: 3 - 1

  • xG: 1.52 - 0.33

  • Passes: 633 - 173

  • Key passes: 14 - 1

  • Penalty area threats: 16 - 3

  • Ball recovery time: 11 seconds - 36 seconds

This match was a night where England's game superiority did not fully translate into points.

For Ghana, it was a point that demonstrated the value of defensive discipline and goalkeeper performance.

19 shots were not enough.

Ghana closed the goal, and England missed the opportunity.

İngiltereGanaDünya Kupası 2026Harry KaneDeclan RiceMarc GuehiBenjamin Asarexgmaç analiziStatsLook

Cerca

Cerca tra giocatori, squadre, campionati, partite e allenatori